Categories
Entertainment

The Impacts of Dangerous Disney Channel Tropes

Recently, many teenagers and previous watchers of the Disney Channel show Jessie have realized that the show relies on racial and gender stereotypes for its comedy, with its depiction of a sassy Black girl, a nerdy Indian boy, and a dumb blonde girl — all clearly problematic stereotypes that push one-dimensional ideas about those groups of people.

Jessie, however, is not the only instance of harmful stereotypes in kids shows — many, if not most, shows we enjoyed as children, particularly Disney Channel programs, were full of harmful tropes. 

One of the most prevalent tropes that Disney Channel used for laughs was the character of a nerdy, dorky, or otherwise strange boy who had unrequited romantic feelings for one of his female friends, usually exhibiting decidedly creepy behavior towards her. 

Fletcher Quimby from A.N.T. Farm, a wimpy art prodigy, has a hopeless crush on his classmate, Chyna, making this clear throughout the series by creating numerous art pieces of her and repeatedly asking her out, despite her resistance to both. 

In Good Luck Charlie, Teddy, the main protagonist, is pursued relentlessly by her brother’s friend Emmett, a glasses-wearing band geek. Despite her obvious disinterest, Emmett gives Teddy the creepily affectionate nickname “Teddy Bear” and tricks her into attending school dances with him. 

Luke Ross from Jessie hits on his nanny, Jessie, who is many years older than him, throughout the show and eventually places a spy camera in her room. 

These unwanted and over-the-line advances were used for comedic effect, but the implications behind them are much more sinister. 

The endorsement of this pattern of behavior taught kids how to treat and talk to other people, allowing them to emulate and encourage it. Boys who saw these interactions take place likely took note that persistence was the way to proceed when one is romantically interested in a girl, and girls likely took note that this was something they had to put up with — both false messages that encourage harmful behavior when instilled in young minds. 

The female characters who were victim to unwanted male advances made their discomfort clear, and real life women and girls who are faced with the epidemic of stalking, harassment, assault, and violence towards women know that this kind of behavior is not at all harmless or funny. 

However, it is portrayed as such — the male characters guilty of this behavior usually face clear obstacles: they are dorky or uncool, the girl they lust after is far out of their league, or, in Luke Ross’s case, they are several years too young.

Writers used this specifically — the harmless, hopeless nature of these male characters — to excuse, normalize, and make a joke out of stalking and harassment. This also encourages the idea that men should “keep trying” when they get turned down by women, which results in women having to deal with persistent advances, quickly turning into harassment and sexual violence. 

There are also instances of this dynamic with the female aggressor and a male victim. However, the women in this situation were not at all portrayed as harmless. 

Contrasting with the pathetic-seeming persistent boy is the character of the very persistent girl, who is often athletic, strong, and sometimes violent. 

Examples of this stereotype include basketball player Willow from Liv and Maddie, who is highly aggressive and has an obsessive infatuation with her friend’s brother, Joey, and sports prodigy Violet from A.N.T. Farm, who has issues controlling her anger and continuously beats up Fletcher because she has a crush on him. Jade West from Nickelodeon’s Victorious is also a high school girl with unrealistically outrageous tendencies towards violence. 

These girls are portrayed as scary and crazy, and the male characters that they hurt, usually because they secretly have romantic feelings towards them, are ridiculed and seen as weak for “being beat up by a girl.” 

Not only does this portray a one-dimensional side of female strength with the idea that strong or athletic girls are automatically crazy and violent, but it also excuses abusive situations and mocks men for being victims. Fletcher from A.N.T. Farm is physically bullied by Violet, but this is used as an opportunity for him to be ridiculed and portrayed as weak. 

This dynamic, which is present all across kids shows, and popular culture, places unrealistic expectations on men and boys — blaming them for not being strong enough and further embracing conformity to a certain traditional masculine ideal, also known as “toxic masculinity.” This warped the mindsets of kids who watched — a young boy who watched someone his own age getting made fun of on TV for crying would likely avoid showing any kind of weakness for fear of the same mockery and social ostracisation.

This emphasis on hyper-masculinity, which still exists in our culture despite recent progress made against it, is the reason for many issues men and boys have with their self-esteem, and can be correlated with far higher male suicide rates. It is also part of the reason for the epidemic of harassment and assault towards women. 

Take Fletcher Quimby, for example: he is consistently mocked by his friends and seen as weak, making him feel inadequate. He feels a need to prove himself, which manifests itself in his pursuit of Chyna, as he hopes that she will eventually say yes, and that this romantic success will finally feel worthy. This, of course, only serves to hurt his friendship with Chyna and make her feel uncomfortable. In more extreme cases, it could lead to assault. 

Although the show writers of A.N.T. Farm portrayed this cycle, their intention was not to enlighten young Disney Channel watchers by breaking down the complexities of heterosexual gender dynamics. The portrayal of Fletcher Quimby as weak, Violet as crazy, and all other characters as their respective stereotypes was meant to do one thing: entertain kids who watched.

And we were those kids. We laughed at the pitiful nerd trying desperately to talk to the girl he liked, and at the crazy girl who yelled anytime the slightest thing upset her. Perhaps not everyone watched Ant Farm or Good Luck Charlie, or even Disney Channel, but these tropes were widespread enough to influence our thinking and treatment of others. 

I may call myself a feminist and call for the breaking down of gender stereotypes, but I find myself cringing every time I see my dad cry. When women around me get angry, I secretly label them as crazy, and avoid ever showing those emotions of my own to not receive that same judgement. Despite the progressive ideas I have taken on, I, like many of us, still carry the burdens of gender stereotypes ingrained in my mind. 

Perhaps not all the blame lies with Disney Channel alone, but there is no doubt that the blatantly sexist tropes of childhood television shows encouraged flawed behavior and ingrained prejudicial ideas in our impressionable young minds. 

The recent addition of many popular Nickelodeon shows like Victorious and iCarly to Netflix and rise of Disney’s streaming service Disney Plus have brought childhood shows back for us to rewatch, and for a new generation to watch. The stereotypes and dynamics we wish to leave behind us are not gone, from us or our televisions. 

Gen Z has branded itself as being revolutionary — a new wave of progressive warriors who can reject racist, sexist stereotypes in favor of an idealized future without any influences from a past tainted by injustice. But damaging gender tropes were ingrained in our young brains through the television we watched, and we cannot immediately shake that. 

So, once we have identified what is wrong, how do we reckon with what has been instilled in us? 

Categories
Features

Girl Scout Troop 569: Helping Girls Realize Their Full Potential

Since Juliette Gordon Low founded the organization in 1911, Girl Scouts have been a part of Americana, serving as a platform for girls to take action in their communities and become leaders. Besides being featured in classic movies like The Addams Family and Whip It or outside grocery stores during cookie season, you can find (former) Girl Scouts in every branch of government, including Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Reverend Patti Oshita of the Sacramento Buddhist Church was a scout years ago when she lived in a small farming community in California. She was part of a singular troop of cadettes led by a creative mom who hosted troop dinners and took them camping. Oshita, who still has her scout uniform, says “during that time, I was shy, so Girl Scouts was something my parents pushed for me to do”.

In 1992, after seeing how there was only a Boy Scouts troop,  Oshita and Judy Inaba asked the Sacramento Buddhist Church to sponsor one. Oshita says, “Our Temple Community has sponsored a Cub Scout Pack & Boy Scout Troop (50) for decades.  We felt Girl Scouting would fill the ‘Scouting’ void for the girls in our community.”

Reflecting on the troop’s early beginnings, Oshita says that in addition to continuing the Girl Scouts practice of teaching girls about community service, leadership, organization, and public speaking skills, she wanted her troops “to be able to experience new activities they have never done before and hopefully develop lifetime friendships.” Taking her experience as a scout into her new role as a troop leader, Oshita worked on reaching out to shyer troop members. “I realized that as a girl, I was the shy kid, so I tried to reach out to these girls and helped them to mingle more.”

Starting out with nine scouts, Oshita and Inaba worked to create a larger troop (569) consisting of over 20 individual troops grouped by age. Each 569 troop hosts their own meetings where they organize activities, do community service, or make headway on the various awards the Girl Scout Organization has to offer. However, Troop 569, is still able to bring its troops ranging from k-12 together for events and ceremonies hosted by the Sacramento Buddhist Church at least three times a year. 

As time went on, Troop 569 began to grow, and today it has about 200 scouts. Oshita believes this growth came from creating a place for girls to grow their leadership skills in their communities. “Having a successful, positive program generates interest and increased participation.” With over 20 leaders that she now manages, Oshita realizes that “having nurturing, responsible leadership is important, and with increasing participation, activity coordination and communication are essential.”

One part of Girl Scouting that requires a lot of organization and coordination is the annual Girl Scout cookie sales. For years, Troop 569 has sold more cookies than any other in the Central California chapter. In 1998, Troop 569 started selling 10,000 boxes annually, which only increased as time went on. Now, according to Oshita, the larger troop sells over 20,000 boxes a year.

The pandemic has taken a toll on almost every major organization, including the girl scouts. Like other troops, 569 can not hold in-person meetings or major events and ceremonies. Still, Oshita remains hopeful, saying “We have found that the girls are more resilient and able to adjust to change easier than us adult leaders.”

After COVID is over and things begin to go back to “normal” Oshita promises that her troops will make community service even more of a priority. She also hopes that more girls join 569. “There are two troops graduating this year, and one has thirteen girls. There’s no way we can get thirteen brand new scouts to join. I’m worried it’ll put a crimp on our program”.

In the future, Oshita hopes that scouts continue to grow and realize their full potential through the many programs put on at a national and county level. Currently, she is working with the national team at Girl Scouts USA to reach out and work towards understanding how to help scouts who are being impacted by the pandemic. To anyone interested in joining Troop 569, Oshita says, “You won’t regret it. The more you put into the program, the more you will gain from it.”

Categories
Racial Justice

A Letter to Governor Newsom

Dear Governor Newsom,

As you are well aware, we are fully in the midst of a crisis, and have been for almost a year now. During the COVID-19 pandemic, millions have been infected and hundreds of thousands of people have died, a disturbing fact that has touched each one of us personally. However, Asian and Pacific Islander Americans (AAPI) have had to simultaneously face a second, more treacherous battle: xenophobic racism.

In short, I am afraid. I am terrified that my elderly grandparents will be targeted when they visit Korea-town or even when they are just walking alone in their own neighborhood. I am afraid that strangers will whisper “COVID” as my Aunt walks by, double-masked with sanitizer in her palm. I am scared that my Dad will have to once again face the same racism that he did all those years of his boyhood. 

Governor Newsom, I am writing because I am disheartened that you still haven’t condemned this onslaught of violent racism happening in your state. California, with the largest AAPI population, has had the most attacks on Asian Americans in the past year. Most of these have been concentrated in the Bay Area and San Francisco, where you were once mayor. It’s hard to believe that you haven’t been following the news in your community, and it’s even worse to think that maybe you just don’t care.

It’s difficult to come to that conclusion, but how can you not recognize the sheer cruelty and hatred that the AAPI community is facing? It’s impossible for us to ignore the attacks that our communities and especially our elders are being subjected to, and as Governor, you should be feeling the same. You are the leader of our state, and yet you have not said a word condemning the violence happening under your watch.

What’s even more difficult to process is how you knew about at least one incident of a racist verbal attack on an Asian family, and did nothing to help them or their community. In July 2020, after the Chan family was attacked by a Tech CEO at the Lucia Restaurant in Monterey, you reposted the GoFundMe page for a white waitress who forced the bigot to leave the premises. The waitress ended up making over $80,000, but by addressing her financial situation instead of the pain the Chans endured, or the Sinophobia espoused by the racist that night, you made it clear that allies should be praised and rewarded to no end for doing a basic kindness. In doing that, you pushed a white savior narrative instead of dealing with the racism at hand.

I’ve waited for months and months hoping that you would denounce the racism at hand but it never happened. May, AAPI Heritage month, came and went. So did the multitude of Festivals, celebrations and holidays within the Asian Community. On Jan. 30, Fred Korematsu Day, which honors and celebrates a heroic AAPI civil rights activist, there was utter silence on the matter. The next day, three elderly Asian Americans were violently pushed to the ground, and just a few days after that, 84 year old Thai Immigrant Vicha Ratanapakdee was killed in your hometown.

With your platform as Governor, you could have brought greater attention to the issues. The utter indifference shown to attacks against our communities has not only been shocking, but also completely terrifying.

We want acknowledgement for the pain and suffering our community is experiencing right now. We need people in charge, like yourself, to address these issues, condemn them, and make them known. We need support. We need guidance and clear leadership to steer us out of the racism that affects us and those we love. We need you to take a stand and finally make a statement condemning the hatred we have faced this past year.

Your tired constituent,

Izzie Kim

Categories
Opinion

The Royal Family’s Anti-Blackness is Unsurprising

Oprah Winfrey’s Mar. 7 tell-all interview with Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, revealed Britain’s royal family’s deep seated anti-blackness. While the general public believed that racial progress was being made when a biracial woman married into the royal family in 2018, Winfrey’s interview explicitly disproved that sentiment and revealed the royal family’s true destructive nature.

 However, this revelation should not be of any surprise or even required an interview. A family directly descended from the creators of chattel slavery is never going to be progressive enough to ever see a black woman as equal. If a black member of a respected, royal family is not safe, where can we be safe?

Markle discussed with Winfrey the many personal attacks she had endured. Before officially entering the royal family, Markle had been continually harassed by the British media. Markle’s every action was somehow demonized and criticized. News articles ranging from holding her belly bump to having her hands in her pockets all somehow managed to be controversial. Even Markle’s consumption of an avocado became a national controversy as tabloids linked her snack to murder and drought. Conversely, Kate Middleton enjoyed avocados and was applauded for their health benefits. 

British media even made blatantly racist comments towards Markle (that the royal family of course did not condemn) describing her as “gangster royalty” and “exotic.” Markle’s Los Angeles upbringing was described as “straight outta Compton” as she was depicted as a stereotypical Black girl from the hood – everyone agreed that she was undeserving of a British prince.

She silently suffered through suicidal ideation while pregnant, and was denied help from the palace. This parallels the experiences of Princess Diana (Harry’s mom) who, while four months pregnant, threw herself down the stairs in what was labeled a possible suicide attempt. 

The royal family and its racist structure, left Markle unprotected and feeling helpless. Providing yet another narrative of a Black woman harassed, neglected, and not receiving the care she needed. The British tabloids’ relentless criticism and the royal family’s explicit racism against Markle led the couple to flee to Canada. 

Further into the interview, Markle explained an additional contributing factor to the couple’s relocation to Canada: her son’s safety. The media compared her son Archie, to a monkey, and the royal family denied Archie a royal title and the protection along with it. Markle commented that his life would be at risk and this was due to Archie being mixed. 

One of the most memorable parts of the Mar. 7 interview is when Markle tells Winfrey that there were even concerns of how dark Archie’s skin might be when born. A child that is a quarter black is nonetheless seen by the royals as a threat to the white family structure despite his royal status. This introduces a further troubling question- if a quarter black child is seen as a disgrace and threat, where does that leave the non-royal black people that the Monarch rules over? 

This interview was jaw dropping to many people. The royal family is supposed to project the image of brave and just leaders, however, their racist rhetoric shows that they have clearly failed. 

People were surprised as Markle recounted her experiences, people felt deceived. The family welcomed a black woman and fabricated the false belief that they were progressive, ultimately plastering on fake smiles and posing for the media to hide their true horrible nature. 

However, I did not find this interview particularly revealing. This family is the direct descendants of the monarchy that created chattel slavery. The power, wealth and authority of the British empire that they now rule over was indisputably built on the backs of slaves. 

Though only a quarter black, the conversation over phenotypical Black features being present in Archie is quite reminscent of the “One-drop” racial classification system present during chattel slavery which declared that any child with even a “drop” of blackness was designated to the status of a slave. 

The same royal family that helped create the “One-drop” rule to preserve their slave states in the 1600s wouldn’t hesitate to deploy it again when their power in the current-day was being tainted by blackness. Mistreating Archie and Markle, being worried over skin tone, and exhibiting overall racist tendencies, speaks truly to how behind the times and unprogressive they really are. 

Colorism, or the prejudice against darker-skinned individuals of a racial or ethnic group, also plays a huge role in the relationship between Markle and the royal family. If this much hate is expressed when a lightskin, mixed woman married into the family, I could not imagine the fallout if Prince Harry had fallen in love with a darker-skinned black woman. Would he have even introduced her to his family? Would he have even married her? Markle has the privilege of being white-passing, yet is still a victim of anti blackness within her own “family”. 

Ultimately, the royal family is only a microcosm for Britain as a whole. Black people in Britain, like almost everywhere else, are not safe. Not safe to speak up, safe under the wing of a powerful family, safe to carry on their blackness to their children, and more. 

The hate Markle received from both the family’s refusal to protect her and her son, and the media’s attacks are just a couple examples of society’s need to silence, attack and demonize Black women. Markle’s interview with Winfrey overwhelmingly confirmed what Black people were already acutely aware of –  anti-blackness is so firmly fixed worldwide.

Categories
Opinion

Black Vaccine Skeptics Have Valid Concerns

The Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines have become increasingly available to the general public based on age-group and relative risk status. However, important concerns and skepticism about the vaccine have been raised by Black Americans across the country. 

These skepticisms include: would the vaccine be differently administered based on race? Would racist healthcare workers be receptive to our reports of discomfort, pain or other complications? Would faulty vaccines be tested on black people without permission? Would Black people disproportionately be given the far less effective Johnson and Johnson vaccine? 

 When making these concerns public, we have been labeled  as “anti-vaccers”, “ill-informed” and “conspiracy theorists”; the list goes on and on. Why are white people, especially white liberals, calling black people names? Didn’t President Biden say that 2021 was the year for unity? 

There are obviously larger structural issues behind the insensitivity of rude remarks, and lack of knowledge of history being the reason why black people are hesitant to trust the racist medical industry and profit-driven transnational pharmaceutical companies. 

The medical field and healthcare system has a cruel and disgusting history of dehumanizing and sterilizing Black people. The long history of abuses has produced an ingrained distrust in yet another system that was designed to fail us. 

The current-day medical industrial complex is quite literally built off of the stripping of bodily autonomy from enslaved Africans deemed suitable for medical demonstrations during chattel slavery. Slaves were bought by doctors for the sole purpose of experimentation. 

In 1932, the Tuskegee experiments that lasted for 40 years made it so that black men were left intentionally untreated for syphilis by the government. A 2017 study found that the atrocity created such distrust that black men have a reduced life expectancy of more than one year. Tuskegee is just one instance of the decievement and withholding of treatment black people have faced. 

 These unimaginable and horrendous experiments continued with the stealing away of Henrietta Lacks’s cancer cells in the 1950s  without her consent and knowledge because the medical industrial complex viewed Black women’s bodies as sites for experimentation. 

It wasn’t until recently that studies claiming that black people feel less pain were explicitly disproved, and still many medical trainees believe it. This myth and other ways deeply rooted racism in the system has permeated itself, has allowed for black women to be up to four times more likely than white women to die of childbirth. 

Recently, french doctors wanted a COVID intervention tested in Africa before anywhere else. Modern day society seeing Africa as a fit testing ground proves the immense racism that leaves many afraid. Generational trauma and distrust is reason for black people to have every right to question the vaccine without judgement.

This all weighs even heavier when keeping in mind that black people have been disproportionately affected by covid. Being more likely to die, it is obviously in our best interest, but it puts us in a position where we must either trust a health care system that has failed and was never built for us or continue to face a deadly virus.

Black people have reasons for concern and are scared for their life. Treating the mistrust as irrational and disrespectfully does not accomplish anything. Black people should not have to be afraid a doctor will not be able to notice pain or dangerous symptoms on darker skin. Health care should be something anyone can easily rely on, but unfortunately that is not a reality. A good first step is to understand why it is this way in the first place.

Categories
Sports

Olympics? During a Pandemic?

The COVID-19 outbreak postponed the 2020 Olympic Games, for the first time in the history of the event. With the pandemic still prevalent, the question of if the 2021 Tokyo Olympics will be able to occur this summer. 

With the event’s fast-approaching opening on July 23, organizers are being forced to accommodate over 10,000 athletes in the midst of the pandemic on a tight schedule.

The event’s preliminary plans have been released within a seemingly brief 34-page document, detailing the sort of predicted requirements for athletes and attendees that will work to keep everyone safe, and reduce the chances of the event causing a coronavirus outbreak. 

The New York Times reports, “by beginning to outline the rules for attending the Games, the organizers showed their determination to proceed even as Tokyo remains under a state of emergency and the Japanese public shows strong opposition to hosting the competitions. New and potentially more dangerous variants of the virus are spreading across the globe, and many countries are struggling to vaccinate their populations.”

COVID-19 is still running rampant, and it looks as though fans from abroad will be prohibited from attending. The Japanese public has shared their concern for hosting the event at this time, and the question of allowing foreign attendees has proved to be a large aspect of their opposition. 

Due to the uncertainty of vaccine quantities, vaccinations will not be required for athletes or fans to attend, with Japan’s own vaccination campaign just recently beginning. 

The released guidelines do require negative tests from all athletes within 72 hours of their departures to Japan and will be tested once again when they arrive at the Games. 

Time spent in the Olympic village will be limited as well, with the athletes encouraged to arrive within five days of their event, and then to depart soon after it ends. 

There will also be strict social distancing practices in place, along with encouragement to remain within the village.

These requirements and any that remain to come will damper the familiar festive spirit that surrounds the Olympics worldwide, and especially within the village and city in which the Games are held. 

However, there is only so much to be done during these unprecedented times. Olympic officials are expecting some inevitable infections, so fever clinics and a hospital area will be set up in preparation.

The Olympic Games are known for being an exciting and inclusive event with participants from all over the globe, which now, after a year of COVID-19 affecting lives worldwide, seems to be nearly impossible to effectively pull off. This summer, the world will be watching (from home of course) to see just how this year’s Olympics play out

Categories
Sports

Let Them Play CA: Student Athletes Demand Lifting Youth Sport Restrictions

Students from various school districts have held multiple rallies over the past couple months as part of the Let Them Play CA movement, which is in favor of lifting restrictions on youth sports for the upcoming spring season. 

At the movement’s most notable events, one rally held in Rocklin mid-January and another at the State Capitol in early February, young athletes spoke out about their experiences without athletics this school year. Some shared stories of how no longer playing has affected their mental health and relationships with substances. 

COVID-19 has especially affected athletes who are seniors this year. Many were relying on their final year of high school athletics for achieving college scholarships and other opportunities that the pandemic has taken from them.

CBS Sacramento reports that over 10,000 signatures and letters from student athletes were delivered to Governor Gavin Newsom’s office at the Capitol, pleading him and members of legislature to lift the restrictions on youth sports.

State guidelines stated that each needs to have a low enough rate of COVID-19 cases for sports to begin practices, and many students and parents turned to their districts as well.

“Understandably, thousands of athletes across the country are anxious to return to their respective sports. I feel that if handled correctly, our much anticipated sports season can return safely,” stated Calix Ho, a McClatchy senior and player on the mens’ volleyball team. 

With glimpses of potentially returning to school, and now with the return to sports, Ho, other student athletes, and other students in general have concerns on how the beginnings of returning to “normal” will go, especially for high schoolers. 

Images of the rallies depict students wearing their masks incorrectly and not following social-distancing mandates. This raises questions of how seriously students will take COVID guidelines when returning to practices, and potentially even to school. 

“The problem is the high school students, not the district. Our district can set as many guidelines as they want. My main concern would be if high school students would uphold and respect these guidelines when allowed to return,” said Ho.

On Tuesday March 2, Sacramento County’s rate of COVID-19 cases dropped low enough for students to be able to return to their respective sports and begin practices and training, for now.  

Categories
News

SCUSD and SCTA Reach Agreement on Reopening for In-Person Instruction

Early in the morning of Mar. 20, Sacramento City Unified School District reached an agreement with the Sacramento City Teachers Association to reopen schools district-wide throughout April after just barely over a year of solely online instruction.

After Sacramento County entered the red tier on Mar. 16, the bargaining process between both organizations was sped up to try to reach an agreement sooner rather than later.

The decided MOU states that Pre-Kindergarten through third grade and kindergarten through sixth Special Day classes will return Apr. 8, all 4-6 grade students on Apr. 15, and all seventh through twelfth grade students on Apr. 22. 

The main goal of both organizations is for all schools to return in a safe manner. The MOU reached provides health and safety standards for both the returning students and staff, classified as one of the best within California. 

The agreement consists of three main pillars to reopen in-person instruction: staff have the opportunity to get fully vaccinated before returning, Sacramento County remains in the red tier, and classrooms will be equipped with the appropriate filters and CO2 monitors to assist with ventilation. 

Other health and safety precautions include on-site trained Medical Assistants to help conduct daily health screenings and to oversee designated Care Rooms set up for students with COVID-19 symptoms, social distancing requirement, sanitation stations, the newly created Health and Safety Committee, sufficient PPE, and ample COVID-19 testing options. 

These safety measures plan to ensure health safety for everyone on campus, using mandatory screenings of all those entering school sites and district facilities with visual wellness checks and health screening forms.

Accommodations for staff with health conditions or child care issues have been included as well, with even hopes of SCUSD and the City of Sacramento working to open child care centers throughout the district to assist staff needs. 

The district’s proposed instructional model was reformed with STCA input to have AA/BB structured weeks as opposed to AB/AB. In secondary school schedules, Groups A and B both will return to in-person instruction, while Group C will remain solely distance learning. Monday will be completely distance learning, Group A will attend campuses on Tuesday (periods 1, 3, and 5) and Wednesday (for periods 2, 4, and 6) while Groups B and C do distance learning. Then Group B will attend in-person on Thursday (periods 1, 3, and 5) and Friday (periods 2, 4, and 6). All synchronous classes Tuesday-Thursday will be completed by lunch for both in-person and distance learning. 

With the start-date moved up, SCUSD announced that families will soon be given another chance to modify their decisions regarding whether or not they would like their students to return to in-person school, a decision previously due by March 17.

Categories
Sports

eSport “Valorant” Hosts First Strike Qualifier

eSport legends including Tyson “Tenz” Ngo and Spencer “Hiko” Martin faced off in one of the first Valorant professional tournaments in December. Valorant is the new first person tactical shooter released by Riot Games. With Riot Games’ exceptional success in the competitive scene for their smash hit game, League of Legends, it isn’t a surprise that their new game would have a promising future in professional competition. 

Regional qualifiers to compete in this tournament, called First Strike, began in mid-October. Players compete in this tournament in teams of five, often with a few alternates. Riot announced that any player over the age of 16 and above the rank of Immortal 1 is eligible to compete, but there are players that everyone expected to see play. Among these players are Victor “food” Wong, Peter “Asuna” Mazuryk, Yassine “Subroza” Taoufik, along with the aforementioned Spencer “Hiko” Martin and Tyson “Tenz” Ngo. Although most of these players first came to the professional scene through the popular Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, a super popular first person shooter developed by Valve and Hidden Path, they continue to dominate in Valorant.

Only 16 out of the many teams that entered for a chance to play were entered into the closed Qualifiers. They were split into four groups with four teams each. Only two teams from each group would advance into the Quarterfinals. Group A consisted of Cloud9 Blue, 100 Thieves, Luminosity Gaming, and XSet. Group B had Gen.G, Complexity, T1, and Equinox eSports. Group C had Team Envy, Sentinels, Spot Up, and Dignitas. The final group, Group D, had TSM, The Slimy Boogermen, Renegades, and Built By Gamers.

The skillful eight that advanced to the quarterfinals who won in a best of three match were Cloud9 Blue, Renegades, Complexity, Envy, T1, Sentinels, TSM, and 100 Thieves. In a shocking turn of events, Cloud9 Blue, for which the elite Tenz plays for, lost to Renegades in the first match of the quarterfinals. Envy conquered Complexity, Sentinels won against T1, and 100 Thieves prevailed against TSM. 

The four teams that triumphed qualified for First Strike, which began in December. 

However, the semi finals were just as surprising as the quarterfinals. These matches, similar to the quarterfinals, were best of three. 100 Thieves beat Sentinels in a close game, which they won 2-1. Envy won against Renegades in another close 2-1 match. 100 Thieves has both Asuna and Hiko, so they were a big threat to begin with, however the Sentinels were widely regarded to be the best North American team. The two teams that lost will have a chance for redemption in First Strike, which will likely be just as intense as the qualifiers.

The two teams facing off in the finals were 100 Thieves and Envy. Unlike the previous matches, the finals were best out of five. The first match was played on Bind, in which Envy won 13-2. The second was played on Split, a very defense oriented map; Envy won again in a much closer 13-9 game. The next map was Ascent, and Envy prevailed once again in a 13-5 victory. Envy won the finals, 3-0.

Some have surmised that 100 Thieves weren’t playing to the best of their abilities, to save some of their strategies and plays for the actual tournament, which has a $100,000 prize pool. Despite their loss, they’ll have the chance to earn redemption next month in the actual tournament, alongside the other teams that had lost.

Categories
Sports

An Unprecedented Move by The 49ers

After new COVID restrictions were put in place in Santa Clara County, preventing sports teams from playing, the Santa Clara 49ers found a temporary home arena in Arizona.

On November 28th, Santa Clara County announced new COVID guidelines which included a three week ban on contact sports that went into effect Nov. 30. Santa Clara has also instituted a quarantine period for anyone who has traveled to the county from over 150 miles away. The county has cited the exponential increase in cases as cause for these new rules, especially as California is having difficulty with having enough hospital space and aid necessary for COVID and non-COVID patients.

In an interview with CBC, Niners Coach Kyle Shanahan said that the team found out about these restrictions through social media while on a plane to their game in Los Angeles. This claim, however, is disputed by the county, who issued a statement saying that “the County of Santa Clara has been in regular communication with the 49ers both before and after the announcement of the revised mandatory directive affecting all contact sports.”

Fortunately for the team, stadiums in both San Diego and Arizona have offered to act as a temporary home arena for the Niners. Jed York, CEO of the Niners, says that the team chose the Cardinals’ Arizona stadium and thanked both Michael Bidwell (Cardinals owner) and the NFL for helping to relocate games. In an interview with the 49ers Webzone, Coach Shanahan told reporters that although he had looked into other Bay Area facilities, nothing seemed as practical as sharing the Cardinals’ stadium.

To prevent a possible COVID spread, the Niners are bringing the entire organization, including chefs. Shanahan has also told his team to stay at their hotel when not at practice, and has made it abundantly clear that they will be following the same COVID protocol as earlier in the season.

With both the Cardinals and the Niners still playing, the teams will have to work out a COVID safe practice schedule. As of now, the Niners are scheduled to use the Cardinal’s training facility for practices.

Only needing one more win to make the playoffs, the Niners plan to play their next two home games against the New York Buffalo Bills and the D.C. Washington Football Team at the Cardinals’ stadium. After these two games, the Niners are traveling against the Dallas Cowboys (Dec. 20) and the Cardinals (Dec. 26). 

The Niner’s season ends Jan. 3 with a home game against the Seattle Seahawks. If all goes as planned, the contact sports ban will be lifted Dec. 21, meaning that the Niners have a chance to play the home game at their Levi Stadium.