Categories
Archive

DACA, and How it May Affect Us

DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) is a federal program which grants benefits to immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. President Barack Obama started DACA in 2012. The benefits provided by DACA include, among others, protection from deportation. President Donald Trump has decided to end the program, and Congress has 6 months to decide what to do with the program and those it protects.
The Prospector interviewed several people around McClatchy, both students and staff, about their thoughts on DACA. In hopes of learning more about DACA’s effects on students, I interviewed Realino Ortiz and Andrea Hernandez, both Seniors. Andrea is the DACA expert at CKM’s Brown Issues club, and Realino is the club’s president.
When asked about his opinion on DACA, Realino said “Everybody should have a opportunity of education, so that’s just dropping everything that somebody’s future had, going forward.”.
Andrea was similarly disappointed by the president’s decision: “Everything that people worked for is going to be taken away, just like that, it’s just not fair at all.”
It is certain the elimination of DACA would be devastating for many at McClatchy, even outside of Brown Issues. When asked, Keara McCarthy, a McClatchy junior, stated the possible deportation of a classmate would be, “Really different… like you just start your life then it’s taken away from you.”
So students don’t seem to support the president’s decision to end DACA. How about teachers? The Prospector interviewed English teacher Mrs. Heitz to learn what she thought about the issue. “It’s just cruel to the students who have been given a chance to be here in America, and now we are telling them for whatever reason, that they aren’t good enough.”
The future of DACA, and those affected by it, seems uncertain. Realno and Andrea had a few words of wisdom for their fellow students, however. Andrea said McClatchy students should “Keep pushing through, don’t give up. We’re going to fix this.”
“Just keep your head in the game. Don’t pay attention to all of the things that the president is saying and just focus on education,” added Realino.
If DACA is ended, there will almost certainly be a great disappointment among the students and staff of McClatchy.

Editor’s Note: Political Cartoon created by Diego Alvarez-Machado

Categories
Archive

Title IX

Students may or may not be aware of Title IX, the portion of the United States Education Amendments which says that no school receiving federal funding may discriminate based on gender. It’s most commonly referred to in cases of gender discrimination in sports, but Title IX goes far beyond that. Title IX legally protects students from being discriminated against in access to things such as higher education and employment, as well as the STEM subjects. Not everyone realizes that Title IX provides protections from sexual harassment and assault. This means that all schools that receive federal funding must follow specific guidelines when dealing with sexual assault allegations.
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos recently announced her plans to replace the Obama-era guidelines of Title IX with new guidelines that she claims would better protect victims of sexual assault, as well as those accused of committing sexual assault. In her announcement, she stressed that her proposed reforms would not take away protections from victims, but rather extend protections to the accused. She didn’t specify exactly what the new guidelines would entail, but indicated that the goal of the new guidelines would be to better protect those accused of sexual assault on campuses.
DeVos’s proposal sparked outrage on the internet, with many people labelling it as a rollback of Title IX. Since its inception, Title IX has become a symbol of women’s rights and gender equality. So when DeVos announced her plans to change it, many people, especially those on the left, were immediately worried, considering the Trump administration’s dismissive views on sexual harassment and assault.
While it isn’t necessarily a rollback of Title IX, the people’s outrage is not unwarranted. DeVos’s proposed reforms are, on paper, completely fair. They don’t legally give anyone special privileges, and many argue that strengthening the fairness of a trial is always a good idea. But it’s what happens behind the scenes that may pose a threat to the safety of students. The Department of Education’s head of civil rights, Candace Jackson, claimed that these protections are being put into place because “ninety percent of campus accusations are over drunk or breakup sex.” While this claim has no statistical evidence whatsoever, the ideology behind it is alarming to say the least, and it has heavy implications of victim-blaming. Jackson’s words also imply that almost every person who reports an on-campus sexual assault is lying. How can someone with this ideology really claim to support and protect victims of sexual assault?
Many people were also concerned because a “men’s rights” group was consulted in the making of these reforms. The group has been accused of harassing women online and in general expressing many anti-woman sentiments.
It’s impossible to think about these reforms without considering President Trump’s legacy of sexual assault. Not only has he himself been accused of sexually assaulting women, but he has openly defended known sexual criminals. Earlier this year, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly was fired for sexually harassing several of his co-workers. President Trump openly defended him, saying he was a “good person” who “didn’t do anything wrong.” This all comes almost a year after the infamous leaked recording of President Trump in which he brags about sexual assault in terms we can’t even print in this publication.
Vice President Joe Biden, who was personally involved in the writing of several Title IX guidelines, was quick to respond to DeVos’s proposed changes, calling it “a step in the wrong direction.”
Ultimately, DeVos’s plans to rework the guidelines put in place by Title IX come off as dismissive of the realities of on-campus sexual assault in the United States. As of now, one in every five women are sexually assaulted in college, and one in every fifteen men. These statistics increase sharply for LGBTQ+ students and disabled students. In contrast, only about two to ten percent of sexual assault accusations are false reports. While DeVos argues that even one false report warrants her new guidelines, she fails to address that the vast majority of on-campus sexual assaults go unreported. This means that the number of students falsely accused of sexual assault is likely substantially lower than two percent, causing many people to ask: is this really the most important aspect of campus sexual assault that we should be focusing on right now? Many people think it’s just an excuse for actively defending rapists, and won’t actually do anything to help the issue of sexual assault which plagues our campuses across the country.

Categories
Archive

Presidential Debate

The Fox Business Network (FBN) streamed the Republican Presidential Debate live on Thursday, January 14th, from the North Charleston Coliseum and Performing Arts Center in South Carolina. The debate featured the numerous candidates vying for the party’s nomination, including Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, John Kasich, Marco Rubio and Chris Christie. They focused on economic, domestic, and international policy issues.

During the debate, Ted Cruz was targeted because of his birth in Canada, despite having American parents. In retaliation, he pointed out how some of the strictest rules mandate that in order to run for president, a candidate must not only be born in the United States, but both of the candidate’s parents have to be born in the country as well. On such grounds, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio would all be disqualified. “But I was born here” pointed out Trump, the current Republican frontrunner. “On the issue of citizenship, it’s different,” said Cruz.

At that point, Rubio said he thought they were straying from the most important topics, and decided to focus on the current president, Democrat Barack Obama. Rubio said that back in 2008, the United States elected a president that did not want to fix the country, but instead wanted to change it altogether. He claimed that Obama did not believe in the Constitution, and was instead working to undermine the document and weaken America on a global scale. “That’s why I’m running for office,” he said. “When I become president of the United States, we are going to repeal every single one of his unconstitutional orders, take away Obama Care, and we are rebuilding our military” he continued.

According to the World Bank, the United States is already one of the top spenders for military purposes out of all the nations in the world. Even a powerful country such as Russia spends only half of what we do. And while the amount of men enrolled in the military has been taken down to it’s minimum, the access to new, technological, and sophisticated resources, including the use of drones, has lowered the number of casualties in war. Rubio finished off by saying: “We’re not just gonna have a president that says, ‘America is the greatest country in the world;’ we’re gonna have a president that acts like it.” It was this one point, Obama being a bad president, that all the candidates agreed upon.

Immigration was also discussed during the debate. Rubio said that our legal immigration system from now on has to be merit-based. He asserted that permission to enter the country ought to granted based on what skills one has to offer, what one can contribute to the economy, and most importantly, whether or not one is coming here to “not just live in America, but be an American.” His plan for immigration reform included building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and a tracking system for those entering the country. He explained his system saying that, “Forty percent of the people who come here illegally come legally, and then overstay the visa. We need a mandatory e-verify system.” Rubio continued, “If you’re a criminal, obviously, you will not be able to stay.”

When asked about Rubio’s comments, Clarissa Schöenborn (‘17) said, “I don’t think he is right. I don’t even believe he believes what he is saying. I think that Marco Rubio is pandering to the extreme side of the Republican electorate. Most Republican candidates have to do this because that is the segment of their likely voters that is most likely to turn out to vote in primaries.” In past primary elections, there has been a trend of more conservative and politically active Republicans going out to vote for the party’s presidential candidates. The same is true for the Democratic Party, with more primary voters attracted to the further political left. She added, “The Republican electorate, when it comes to immigration, is widely perceived as having two opposing sides. On one side you have business interests that benefit from immigration, and they benefit even more if migrants are here illegally since it is easier to exploit illegal migrants. On the other side you have the individuals who advocate for tactics like deportation. This group is larger than the first, and their economic situation is in decline.” She concluded, “Often, they blame migrants for this decline, and this frustration is expressed as racism and calls for deportation.”
León de la Torre (‘16) believes, “Candidates like Rubio are financed by the business interests of the Republican Party, but they are elected by the more numerous side (the one in economic decline). Thus, most of their statements at this stage have to be seen through this lens. Once the general election comes along, I would be willing to bet that all calls for a wall and mass deportations will cease since at that time Marco Rubio will be pandering to a different set of voters.” Among the different set of voters referred to is the large majority of moderate voters in the U.S. that participate in the general election and are quite influential in choosing the country’s president. Generally, such voters are not as likely to be so strict on matters of immigration as Rubio pronounced during the debate. He elaborated, “This is not to say that all candidates are pandering when they make outlandish statements.” Rubio, however, prior to campaigning his position on the issue was much more moderate, and he even authored bills to create a possible path for citizenship for current illegal immigrants.

According to Fox, the previous debate, which took place back in November, was the most watched livestreamed event ever with 13.5 million people watching. Since then, Donald Trump has continued to be the current top Republican candidate followed by Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, and Carly Fiorina.